CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT
« Perhaps The Boss Should Have Been More Specific |
| Perfect Place For Cucumber »
Posted by Freddy on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 | Permalink
the time spent preparing this could have been used to help cure cancer
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 at 09:13 PM
If Barbie were a person, her measurements would be 39-21-33 [or so I've been told]. I don't know a single actual human proportioned remotely like that.
The Last Archimedean |
Wednesday, April 17, 2013 at 09:32 PM
@Elvis - Except the person who did this probably does not have the expertise to find a cure for cancer.
Poetry Otter |
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 02:59 AM
I don't get it. It's a toy. It is not meant for realism.
Where are all the graphics criticizing GI Joe for impossible roided out body types and insanely cool vehicles?
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 04:03 AM
@Evis - There's not a bunch of people whining that GI Joe gives little boys impossible physical standards to live up to.
I wish people would get it's not Barbie that causes little girls to hate their bodies. It's bullies who constantly put them down for not looking like the girls in tv shows and movies, PE teachers who still measure the BMI and belittle the girls for not being perfect, parents who put pressure on them to look a certain way, and a clothing industry that makes their outfits for only a small percentage of people rather than the majority of body types.
Yet all the blame falls upon an innocent doll.
The Singing Library Clerk |
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 05:49 AM
@TLA: It used to be something like that, yeah. The doll has been redesigned since, IIRC, to be somewhat more (if not entirely) realistic.
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 06:28 AM
What annoyed me about Barbie is she could never sit at a table with her stupid long, straight legs! :p
Poetry Otter |
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 10:21 AM
The main reason for the unrealistic ratios of Barbie's body is that the clothes are made with normal-thickness cloth. If the cloth were to scale it'd be the thickness of tissue paper.
Marten Kemp |
Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 12:39 PM
Barbie was never meant to have realistic human proportions. She was originally designed to be a "fashion doll" - i.e. as a way to display/play with all her outfits and whatnot. Back in the day, when stuff like sewing was still considered an essential female skill, girls were meant to be able to make outfits for her, just like their moms made outfits for them.
Kayla S. |
Friday, April 19, 2013 at 06:04 AM
What annoyed me about Barbie was that she always had to walk on her damn tip toes unless she had heels on.
Friday, April 19, 2013 at 06:22 AM
Nomnom: She doesn't have knees, and you expect her to have ankles?
Friday, April 19, 2013 at 09:00 PM
Horrible resized image. Original source:
Su Chan |
Saturday, April 20, 2013 at 10:48 PM
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address
FOR MORE ABOUT RHU CLICK HERE
Little Monster Hell