From u/Goatboy6947, TalesFromTheCustomer
This is a tale of a poor retail experience, with a belligerent and obnoxious store owner, who thought he was above the law.
These events took place some time ago, and started when I noticed a couple of ties I’d bought were faulty. The fabric was bunching, which made the ties unpresentable and they were only a couple of weeks old. At $50 each, these weren’t expensive ties, but getting more than a couple of weeks wear seemed reasonable. A friend with a background in the clothing industry looked at them, and advised this was poor workmanship.
Not expecting this to be a big deal, I headed to the clothing store to return them. Or rather, attempted to. I explained the issue to the store owner, showed him the state of the ties, and emphasised I was happy to swap them and wasn’t necessarily looking for a refund. In my experience exchanging goods is a straightforward process, particularly when the purchase was recent and he problem evident. But not here. For clarity, this was a small chain of clothing stores with what appeared to be a single owner (who I was dealing with).
Immediately this man became belligerent. He looked over the ties carefully and claimed nothing was wrong with them. I pointed out the obvious defects, to which he announced that ironing would sort it out. Like a cheap showman, he flourished an iron and went to work on the ties. When he finished, they were exactly the same.
By now I’d had enough, and told him I wasn’t interested in wasting any more time, and I’ll take a refund thank you very much. At this point, he lost it, and started screaming and gesticulating, claiming I was there to rip him off etc... I took the worthless ties and left.
Normally, I would have forgotten about it, as a hundred bucks isn’t worth wasting a lot of time over. However my employer was imploding due to the owners infighting, and I had more time than usual on my hands. And given this guy’s over the top attitude, I decided to file a complaint with the government consumer board.
Shortly there was a hearing. The owner appeared to defend himself. I told my tale and showed the state of the ties to the arbitrator. Predictably the owner was pissed and carried on like he was the aggrieved party. The arbitrator saw right through him, ruled in my favour, and he was instructed to refund my money.
The following day I showed up to collect my cash, and unsurprisingly, he refused to pay and suggested I go and reproduce with myself.
So, I contacted the board who told me to take the ‘judgement’ (I can’t remember the exact term) to the Sheriff’s department who would collect the money on my behalf.
Weeks went by and I forgot all about it, when I was contacted by the board to come in and meet with the owner.
In the meeting room was the arbitrator, the owner, and his wife. Now, as this guy (the owner) sat at the table he was a partial shade of red, and a vein pulsing in his forehead was threatening to burst. I imagined he was pissed at being dragged in to actually pay up, but it was more than that.
As I sat down, he started to rant. He owned a chain of stores, and the sheriff paid a visit to his most exclusive one, located next to a luxury hotel. Because of the address, this location sold more expensive goods than his other stores.
I assumed the sheriff just rocked up and demanded payment. But no, in a case where the party hadn’t paid up, the sheriff will seize goods to be auctioned for the debt. This is the fun part (for me anyway). Because goods at auction fetch much lower than retail prices, the sheriff has discretion as to how much he takes. Consequently, he decided a fair amount of goods to seize was an entire rack of expensive suits. From the description, this might have been ten thousand dollars worth of merchandise.
Not only was the obnoxious owner out a tonne of stock, but a sheriff had barged into his flagship store, and created a ruckus, which wasn’t exactly great for his brand.
In the meeting the owner was almost hyperventilating at the arbitrator, who calmly explained that he had chosen to ignore his obligation and this was the consequence. His goods had yet to be auctioned, so he was given the option of paying now, and his suits would be returned to him. However, he would also have to pay additional fees for the sheriff’s time and effort.
Spluttering objections, he took out a hundred bucks and flung it across the table at me. I smiled graciously, took the money, and wished him well.
--u/Goatboy6947